TELAAH HADIS KEPEMIMPINAN QURAISY MELALUI PENDEKATAN SOSIO-HISTORIS

Wildan Fatoni Yusuf; Hilmi Husaini Zuhri

doi:10.61994/alshamela.v1i2.182

Authors

Wildan Fatoni Yusuf Ma'had Aly Lirboyo Kediri Author
Hilmi Husaini Zuhri Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kediri Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61994/alshamela.v1i2.182

Keywords:

Quraisy Leadership, Hadith, Socio-Historical

Abstract

Al-Mawardi listed the Quraish nasab as the seventh condition for the Ahl Imamah, which received many corrections from hadith scholars. The main reason is that the meaning of hadith is no longer relevant when it collides with current sociological realities. However, Al-Mawardi's argument is quite strong, because the majority of fuqaha simultaneously require that the highest leadership of the country must be of the Quraysh line. Therefore, this research answers this problem by examining the universal meaning in the Hadith and then contextualizing it. This research is included in library research whose methodological steps focus on interpretation using the asbabul wurud 'am approach (the cause of the decline of hadith at a macro level). The results of this research show that the hadith of the Quraish leadership which reads "al-Aimmatu min Quraishin" has a strong position as proof and evidence for the requirement of Imamah from the descendants of the Quraish. According to the majority of ulama, the scope of this hadith only focuses on the context of the highest leader of an Islamic state, not the area of leadership whose political power is under the imamate of Zuma. Therefore, these hadiths tend to be technical and casuistic. However, the context of this hadith shows that the Quraysh had great power and influence. Leadership which has a strong influence in society is ultimately implemented in the leadership model in Indonesia.

References

Abu Muhammad Addainuriy, Abdullah bin Muslim bin Qutaibah. Ta’wil Muktalaf al-Hadis. Beirut: Dar al-Jail, 1972.

Ahmad bin Hanbal, Muhammad bin. Musnad Ahmad Ibn Hanbal. Vol. 3. Kairo: Muassasah Qurtubah, 1978.

‘Ain Mahmud, Badruddin al-. ‘Umdah al-Qari, Syarh Shahih al-Bukhari. Vol. 1. Beirut: Dar al-‘Ihya’ at-Turats, n.d.

Al-Khatabi. Ma’alim as-Sunan Syarh Sunan Abu Dawud. Vol. 4. Alepo: al-Mathba’ah al-‘Ilmiyah, 1932.

Al-Mawardi, Abu Al-Hasan. Al-Ahkām As-Sulṭāniyyah. Jakarta: Qisthi Press, 2014.

Al-Munawi, Abdurrouf. Faiḍ Al-Qadīr. Vol. 3. Lebanon: Dār Al-Kurub Al-Ālamiyyah, 1994.

Al-Qurthubiy, Abu al-Abbas Al-Anshari. Al-Mufhim Lima Usyqila Min Talkhīṣi Kitābi Muslim. Vol. 12. CD: Maktabah Syamilah, n.d.

Arnauth, Syuaib al-. Mukaddimah Tahqiq Musnad Ahmad. Vol. 1. Kairo: Muassasah Qurtubah, 1978.

As-Suyūti, Jalaluddin. Al Itqan Fi Ulum Al-Qur'an. Vol. 1. Saudi Arabia: Wazārah As-Su’ūn Al-Islāmiyyah wa Al-Awqaf wa Ad-Da’wah, 1998.

———. Alfiyah As-Suyūti Fi Ilmil Al-Hadīs. Mesir: Al-Maktabah AL-‘Alamiyyah, 1934.

‘Asyqalâni, Ibn Hajar al-. Fath Al-Bâri Syarh Shahîh al-Bukhâri. Vol. 13. Beirut: Dar al-Ma’rifah, 1960.

Az-Zuhaili, Wahbah. Kitab Fiqih Islam Wa Adillatuhu. Vol. 6. Damaskus: Darul Fikri, 1985.

Firdinal, Ziffany. “Perubahan Makna Pasal 6A Ayat (2) UUD 1945.” Jurnal Konstitusi 10, no. 4 (2016). https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1045.

Hanbal, Ahmad bin. Musnad Ahmad Bin Hanbal. Vol. 3. Kairo: Muassasah Qurtubiyyah, n.d.

Helmy, Mustafa. The Caliphate System In Islamic Thought. Kairo: Dār Al-Kutub Al-Ilmiyyah, 2009.

Ibn Khaldun, Abd al-Rahman bin Muhammad. Muqaddimah Ibn Khaldun. Beirut: Dâr al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyah, 2009.

Krishna Jaya, Canra. “Kritik Terhadap Pemahaman Yang Menyatakan Bahwa Kepemimpinan Islam Harus Berasal Dari Bani Quraisy.” Al Ashriyyah 4, no. 2 (2018): 15. https://doi.org/10.53038/alashriyyah.v4i2.38.

Lewis, Bernard. The Arabs in History. Reissued. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.

Lings, Martin. Muhammad, Kisah Hidup Nabi Berdasarkan Sumber Klasik, Penerjemah: Qomaruddin SF. Jakarta: PT Serambi Ilmu Merdeka, 2007.

Melyani, Mila dan Reza Pahlevi Dalimounthe. “Pemahaman Hadis Kepemimpinan Quraisy (Studi Komparatif Tipologi Kepemimpinan Quraisy Dengan Tipologi Kepemimpinan Di Indonesia).” Diroyah: Jurnal Ilmu Hadis 4, no. 2 (2020).

Muhammad Al-Qari, Ali bin Sulthan. Mirqatul Mafatih Syarh Misykatul Mashabih. Vol. 9. Bairut: Dar Al-Kutub Islamiyyah, 2019.

Munawwar, Said Agil Husin, and Abdul Mustaqim. Asbabul wurud: studi kritis hadis Nabi, pendekatan sosio-historis-kontekstual. Cet. 1. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2001.

Mustofa, Imam. “Memahami Hadits Kepemimpinan Dari Bangsa Quraisy dan Relevansinya Dengan Konsep Kepemimpinan Kontemporer.” Al-Dzikra: Jurnal Studi Ilmu al-Qur’an dan al-Hadits 14, no. 2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.24042/al-dzikra.v14i2.6578.

Nurrohman, Muhammad Ridwan. “Quraisy dan Hegemoni Kuasa Atas Agama; Studi Analitis Ilmu Hadis dan Sosial.” Diroyah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis 3, no. 1 (2018). https://doi.org/10.15575/diroyah.v3i1.3726.

Putra, Hari. “Memahami Hadis Kepemimpinan Quraisy.” Skripsi, Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah, 2018.

Setiadi, Ozi dan Muh Amiruddun, “Legitimasi Kepemimpinan Bani Quraisy.” Riwayah: Jurnal Studi Hadis 5, no. 1 (2019).

Sudianto, Ahmad. “Metodologi Penulisan Musnad Ahmad Ibn Ḥanbal.” Jurnal As-Salam 1, no. 1 (2017).

Thubani, Abu al-Fadh as-Senori ath-. Ad-Durar al-Farid Fi Syarh Jauharat at-Tauhid. Rembang: al-Maktabah al-Anwariyyah, n.d.

Tim Kementerian Wakaf Kuwait. Al-Mausū’ah Al-Fiqhiyyah. Vol. 6. Kuwait: Kementerian Wakaf Kuwait, 1980.

Yahya Annawawi, Abu Zakariya. Syarh An-Nawawi ‘ala Sahih Muslim. Bairut: Dar Ihyā’ At-Turats Al-Arabiy, 1972.

Zumrodi. “Studi Analisis Ka’idah “al-Ibrah Bi Khusus al-Sabab La Bi Umum al-Lafdhi” Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Sikap Moderasi Beragama.” Jurnal Penelitian 16, no. 1 (2022).