Metacrime and Online Deviance: Law Enforcement Complexities in the Metaverse Era
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61994/jsls.v4i1.1679Keywords:
metacrime, online deviance, law enforcement, metaverse eraAbstract
Law enforcement in the metaverse era has placed authorities and policymakers in increasingly complex challenges of prevention and enforcement. While existing studies offer valuable insights, they remain limited in addressing the emerging dynamics of crime within conventional digital environments. In addition to addressing the limitations of existing studies, this research aims to explain the characteristics of online crime and deviant behavior in the Metaverse and their implications for law enforcement practices. This study adopts a qualitative descriptive approach grounded in multimodal ethnography to elucidate the patterns, operational modalities, and forms of impact that emerge within immersive environments. The key findings indicate that crime in the Metaverse not only transcends the characteristics of conventional violations but also generates more complex forms of symbolic, psychological, and virtual economic harm. Anonymity, cross-jurisdictional interactions, and avatar-mediated engagement further complicate the attribution of legal responsibility. In other words, the transformation of digital spaces necessitates more responsive regulatory adaptation to ensure effective legal protection. The significance of this study lies in its contribution as a conceptual foundation for the development of policies and law enforcement strategies in the metaverse era.
References
Abouahmed, A., Kandeel, M. E., & Zakaria, A. (2024). Personal data protection in the United Arab Emirates and the European Union regulations. Journal of Governance and Regulation, 13(1), 195–202. https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv13i1art17
AllahRakha, N. (2024). Cybersecurity Regulations for Protection and Safeguarding Digital Assets (Data) in Today’s Worlds. Lex Scientia Law Review, 8(1), 405–432. https://doi.org/10.15294/lslr.v8i1.2081
Antwi, N. (2025). Forensic Artifacts in Operating Systems Windows vs. Linux. In Leveraging Large Language Models for Quantum-Aware Cybersecurity (pp. 169–200). https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-1102-9.ch006
Azhar, R., Rifmayanti, C., Siregar, R. A., Harahap, A. R., & Ikhsan, M. (2026). The Paradox of Religiosity: Corruption Practices in Islamic Faith-Based Organizations. Criminology & Islamic Law, 1(1), 1–17. https://journal.postinsti.com/index.php/cil/article/view/1
Bates, L. (2025). Misogyny in the metaverse: is Mark Zuckerberg’s dream world a no-go area for women? Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2025/jun/10/the-misogyny-of-the-metaverse-is-mark-zuckerbergs-dream-world-a-no-go-area-for-women
Berlin, S. (2022, January 31). Mother Alleges She Was Virtually Groped in Attack Inside Facebook’s Metaverse. Newsweek. https://www.newsweek.com/mother-alleged-she-was-virtually-groped-attack-inside-facebooks-metaverse-1674718
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms of Capital. In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241–258). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285376612_The_Forms_of_Capital
Cao, O. T., & Vu, T. Van. (2025). Insoluble Challenges of Prosecuting Transnational Cybercrime: A Case in a Developing Country. Journal of Forensic Medicine Science and Law, 34(1), 60–63. https://doi.org/10.59988/jfmsl.vol.34issue1.12
Chawki, M., Basu, S., & Choi, K.-S. (2024). Redefining Boundaries in the Metaverse: Navigating the Challenges of Virtual Harm and User Safety. Laws, 13(3), 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws13030033
Clarke, R. V. G. (1980). Situational Crime Prevention: Theory and Practice. The British Journal of Criminology, 20(2), 136–147. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a047153
Denegri-Knott, J., & Taylor, J. (2005). The Labeling Game: A Conceptual Exploration of Deviance on the Internet. Social Science Computer Review, 23(1), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439304271541
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Rana, N. P., Baabdullah, A. M., Kar, A. K., Koohang, A., Ribeiro-Navarrete, S., Belei, N., Balakrishnan, J., Basu, S., Behl, A., Davies, G. H., Dutot, V., Dwivedi, R., Evans, L., Felix, R., Foster-Fletcher, R., Giannakis, M., … Yan, M. (2023). Exploring the Darkverse: A Multi-Perspective Analysis of the Negative Societal Impacts of the Metaverse. Information Systems Frontiers, 25(5), 2071–2114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-023-10400-x
Effing, R., & Hinz, M. (2024). Are Children Ready for the Metaverse? The Minefield of Virtual Participation in Digital Social Spaces with Harmful Content and Behavior. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-70804-6_1
Febriansyah, F. I., Ikhwan, A., Firdausi, U. S., & Anggoro, A. D. (2026). Digital Legal Transformation: Legal Strategies for Strengthening National Cybersecurity. International Journal of Law and Society, 5(1), 26–44. https://doi.org/10.59683/ijls.v5i1.357
Fekolli, S., Çela, E., Erdolatov, C., Biyashev, B., & Ismailova, G. (2025). Analysis of the Impact of Digital Transformation of the Legal Field on Data Cybersecurity. Revista de Direito, Estado e Telecomunicacoes, 17(2), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.26512/lstr.v17i2.56766
Fernando, H., & Larasati, Y. G. (2022). Metaverse and Hajj: The Meaning of Muslims in Indonesia. Kuriositas Media Komunikasi Sosial Dan Keagamaan, 15(2), 195–217. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35905/kur.v15i2.2622
Fernando, H., & Larasati, Y. G. (2026). AI-Enabled Symbolic Violence Against Muslims: Protecting Honor in Islamic Law. Criminology & Islamic Law, 1(1), 18–35. https://journal.postinsti.com/index.php/cil/article/view/2%0A
Fernando, H., Larasati, Y. G., Abdullah, I., Florika, V. T., & Liyana, C. I. (2025). The Deconstruction of Women ’ s Values in # MeToo on Instagram. Italian Sociologial Review, 15(January), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.13136/isr.v15i1.821
Fernando, H., Larasati, Y. G., Barkah, Q., Andriyani, & Morin, L. (2025). Religion in the Metaverse Scheme: Practices of Worship in the New Media Age. ESENSIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin, 26(1), 12–26. https://doi.org/10.14421/esensia.v26i1.6445
France-Presse, A. (2022, February 5). Meta adds “personal boundary” tool to virtual world after harassment reports. Times of Malta. https://timesofmalta.com/article/meta-adds-personal-boundary-tool-to-virtual-world-after-harassment.932476
Freilich, J. D. (2015). Beccaria and Situational Crime Prevention. Criminal Justice Review, 40(2), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016814550815
González-Tapia, M. I. (2023). Virtual emotions and Criminal Law. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260425
Hidayat, R., Julkarnaen, Hakim, M. L., Lestari, S. D., & Suratman, B. (2026). Challenges in Enforcing Islamic Law on the Misuse of Ummah Philanthropic Funds. Criminology & Islamic Law, 1(1), 36–51. https://journal.postinsti.com/index.php/cil/article/view/3
Hine, E. (2023). Content Moderation in the Metaverse Could Be a New Frontier to Attack Freedom of Expression. Philosophy & Technology, 36(3), 43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00645-4
Jayenadmin. (2025, October 27). NFT-Metaverse.online Scam -Fake Metaverse Investment Platform. Jayen Consulting. https://jayen-consulting.com/2025/10/27/nft-metaverse-online-scam-fake-metaverse-investment-platform/
Kalashnikova, E. B. (2022). Personal Data Protection as a Basis of Digitalization. In Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems (pp. 73–79). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83175-2_11
Kang, J., & Rhee, H. (2025). Gender identity and perception in virtual spaces: the impact of avatar gender transition on the ZEPETO platform. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2025.1505624
Kim, S., Youn, C., Cho, E., & Kim, S. (2025). When virtual influencers cause service failures: The impact of human likeness and beauty types on social psychological distance and consumer intentions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 87, 104426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104426
Kuznetsova, O. A., Madzhumayev, M. M., & Grebenev, R. V. (2025). Metacrimes: Criminal Legal Assessment of Offences in AI-Driven Virtual and Augmented Realities (Metaverse). In Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems (pp. 120–128). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-97985-9_15
Larasati, Y. G., Fernando, H., Fitri, W., Wuysang, J. M., Hardianti, F., & Akbar, R. A. (2026). Young Children in War-Time: Making Sense of Palestine-Israel Conflict Impact on Instagram. Italian Sociological Review, 16(1), 181–198. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13136/isr.v16i1.977
Larasati, Y. G., Fernando, H., & Morin, L. (2025). The Stories of Death in Abangan. Societas Dei: Jurnal Agama Dan Masyarakat, 12(1), 45–66. https://doi.org/10.33550/sd.v12i1.516
Leukfeldt, E. R., & Yar, M. (2016). Applying Routine Activity Theory to Cybercrime: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis. Deviant Behavior, 37(3), 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2015.1012409
Magableh, H. Y., & Al-Shawabkeh, B. K. A. (2024). The Problem of Jurisdictional Conflict and the Applicable Law on Cybercrime. Pakistan Journal of Criminology, 16(3), 1287–1298. https://doi.org/10.62271/pjc.16.3.1287.1298
Martha, A. E. (2024). Perundungan Siber (Cyberbullying) Melalui Media Sosial Instagram dalam Teori the Space Transition of Cybercrimes. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 31(1), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol31.iss1.art9
Melis, G., & Monaro, M. (2025). Sexual Crimes in Metaverse: New Frontiers in Forensic Psychology and Legal Challenges. Journal of Metaverse, 5(2), 124–131. https://doi.org/10.57019/jmv.1658955
Narayanan, S., Polys, N., & Bukvic, I. I. (2020). Cinemacraft: exploring fidelity cues in collaborative virtual world interactions. Virtual Reality, 24(1), 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-019-00382-0
Ojha, N. K., & Vaish, A. (2025). Legal and Ethical Issues in the Interaction of AI and Metaverse. In Exploring AI Implications on Law, Governance, and Industry (pp. 155–176). https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-3384-7.ch006
Pandey, P. (2025). Bits and Bytes Betrayal: Unravelling the Dark Threads of Cybercrime in the Metaverse. In Security and Privacy in Smart Environments (pp. 120–148). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-66708-4_6
Qin, H. X., Wang, Y., & Hui, P. (2025). Identity, crimes, and law enforcement in the Metaverse. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 194. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04266-w
Roth, D., Bloch, C., Schmitt, J., Frischlich, L., Latoschik, M. E., & Bente, G. (2019). Perceived Authenticity, Empathy, and Pro-social Intentions evoked through Avatar-mediated Self-disclosures. Proceedings of Mensch Und Computer 2019, 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3340764.3340797
Scott, B. (2023). Protecting Vulnerable Consumers Within the Metaverse. In Influencer Marketing Applications Within the Metaverse (pp. 117–131). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-8898-0.ch008
Sepulveda, C. E. L., Taherdoost, H., & Farhaoui, Y. (2025). Balancing Data Protection in the Age of Digitization. In Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems (pp. 701–708). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-88304-0_95
Setiyawan, N. E., Karauwan, D. E. S., Jumiran, & Ghafar, A. A. (2024). The Effect of Digital Technology on Criminal Law Enforcement: an Analysis of Cybercrime and its Handling. Mawaddah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 2(2), 229–248. https://doi.org/10.52496/mjhki.v2i2.169
Sharma, A., Kumar, S., Singh, S. K., Jawla, S., Arya, V., & Chui, K. T. (2025). Virtual Identity and Self-Expression in the Metaverse. In Unveiling Social Dynamics and Community Interaction in the Metaverse (pp. 93–110). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-8628-6.ch005
Sideris, L. H. (2011). I See You: Interspecies Empathy and Avatar. Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture, 4(4), 457–477. https://doi.org/10.1558/jsrnc.v4i4.457
Tilley, N., & Sidebottom, A. (2014). Situational Crime Prevention. In Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice (pp. 4864–4874). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_549
Tiwari, M., Zhou, Y., Gilmour, P., & Bernot, A. (2025). Confronting metacrime: complexities, enforcement challenges, and regulatory pathways. Law, Innovation and Technology, 17(1), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2025.2469347
Tschanter, J., Merz, C., Wienrich, C., & Latoschik, M. E. (2026). How Harassment Shapes Self-Perception and Well-Being in Social VR: Evidence from a Controlled Lab Study. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2026.3680575
Unesa. (2025). Perang Siber dan Ancaman Keamanan Digital Global di Tahun 2025. https://agridigi.fkp.unesa.ac.id/post/perang-siber-dan-ancaman-keamanan-digital-global-di-tahun-2025
Valera, L., Alamos, F., Ramos, P., & Vera, T. (2026). Bodies in the metaverse: Is there “someone” out there? AI & SOCIETY, 41(1), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02439-y
Webb, S. (2001). Avatarculture: Narrative, power and identity in virtual world environments. Information, Communication & Society, 4(4), 560–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180110097012
Wiwoho, J., Kharisma, D. B., & Wardhono, D. T. K. (2021). Financial Crime In Digital Payments. Journal of Central Banking Law and Institutions, 1(1), 47–70. https://doi.org/10.21098/jcli.v1i1.7
XinYing, C., Tiberius, V., Alnoor, A., Camilleri, M., & Khaw, K. W. (2024). The Dark Side of Metaverse: A Multi-Perspective of Deviant Behaviors From PLS-SEM and fsQCA Findings. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 41(5), 3128–3148. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2331875
Yang, L., Xu, Y., & Hui, P. (2025). Framing metaverse identity: A multidimensional framework for governing digital selves. Telecommunications Policy, 49(3), 102906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2025.102906
Zhou, Y., Tiwari, M., Bernot, A., & Lin, K. (2024). Metacrime and Cybercrime: Exploring the Convergence and Divergence in Digital Criminality. Asian Journal of Criminology, 19(3), 419–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-024-09436-y
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Henky Fernando, Yuniar Galuh Larasati

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.









