The Effect of Work–Life Balance and Work Environment on Employee Performance with Work Motivation as an Intervening Variable at the Department of Agriculture of North Tapanuli Regency

Novita Sari Dewi Hutasori; Mesra B; Sri Rahayu; Muhammad Isa Indrawan

doi:10.61994/equivalent.v4i1.1831

Authors

Novita Sari Dewi Hutasori Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi, Medan, North Sumatra Author
Mesra B Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi, Medan, North Sumatera Author
Sri Rahayu Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi, Medan, North Sumatera Author
Muhammad Isa Indrawan Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi, Medan, North Sumatera Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61994/equivalent.v4i1.1831

Keywords:

Work–Life Balance, Work Environment, Work Motivation, Employee Performance

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the effects of work–life balance and work environment on employee performance, with work motivation as an intervening variable, at the Department of Agriculture of North Tapanuli Regency, North Sumatra, Indonesia. The research employed a quantitative associative design to analyze both direct and indirect relationships among variables. The study population consisted of 244 employees, including civil servants (PNS), government employees with work agreements (PPPK), and non-civil servants. Using the Slovin formula with a 10% error tolerance, a sample of 80 respondents was selected through simple random sampling. Data were collected using structured questionnaires and analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) based on Partial Least Squares (PLS) with SmartPLS version 3.3.3. The measurement model demonstrated satisfactory validity and reliability, with all indicators meeting the criteria for convergent and discriminant validity, Average Variance Extracted (AVE) values exceeding 0.50, and Composite Reliability values above 0.70. Structural model evaluation revealed that work–life balance has a strong positive and significant effect on employee performance (β = 0.958; t = 39.057; p < 0.001), indicating that employees who are able to balance work responsibilities and personal life tend to perform better. In contrast, the work environment does not have a significant direct effect on employee performance (β = −0.072; t = 0.639; p > 0.05). Furthermore, both work–life balance (β = 0.163; t = 7.296; p < 0.001) and work environment (β = 0.897; t = 45.113; p < 0.001) have positive and significant effects on work motivation. . However, work motivation does not significantly affect employee performance (β = 0.119; t = 0.946; p > 0.05) and does not mediate the relationship between work–life balance or work environment and employee performance. These findings suggest that employee performance improvement is driven primarily by direct work–life balance policies rather than through motivational mechanisms. Managerial implications highlight the importance of implementing effective work–life balance strategies supported by objective performance management systems in public sector organizations.

References

Abdullah, M. (2020). Manajemen dan Evaluasi Kinerja Karyawan. Yogyakarta: Aswaja Pressindo.

Allen, T. D., French, K. A., Dumani, S., & Shockley, K. M. (2020). A cross-national meta- analytic examination of predictors and outcomes associated with work–family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(6), 539–576.

Armstrong, M., & Taylor, S. (2020). Armstrong’s Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice (15th ed.). London: Kogan Page.

Avolio, B. J., Sosik, J. J., Kahai, S. S., & Baker, B. (2024). Digital leadership and organizational effectiveness in public sector institutions. Leadership Quarterly, 35(2), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2023.101672

Efendi, Muklis, and Mesra B. 2023. “The Role Of Work Discipline In Mediating Teamwork And Work Environment On Employee Performance (Study At The Property Office, Pt. Graha Kreasi Medan).” 2(2).

Ginting, Ryanda Pranata, and Muhammad Isa Indrawan. 2023. “Effect of Work Experience and Work Facilities on Employee Performance with Work Motivation as an Intervening Variable Binjai City Department of Transportation.” 2.

Greenhaus, J. H., & Allen, T. D. (2020). Work–family balance: A review and extension of the literature. In J. C. Quick & L. E. Tetrick (Eds.), Handbook of Occupational Health Psychology (3rd ed., pp. 165–183). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000154-009

Greenhaus, J. H., & Allen, T. D. (2023). Work–family balance: A review and extension of the literature. Journal of Management, 49(1), 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063221104531

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Haar, J. M., Sune, A., Russo, M., & Ollier-Malaterre, A. (2023). A cross-national study on work–life balance, job satisfaction, and motivation. Human Resource Management Journal, 33(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12461

Herzberg, F. (2020). Work and the Nature of Man. New York: Routledge.

Hidayat, R., & Ramadhan, F. (2024). Peran motivasi kerja dalam memediasi keseimbangan kehidupan kerja terhadap kinerja pegawai sektor publik. Jurnal Manajemen dan Organisasi, 15(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.29244/jmo.v15i2.48912

Kurniawan, A., & Pratiwi, D. A. (2025). Lingkungan kerja dan pengaruhnya terhadap motivasi pegawai pemerintah daerah. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 20(1), 33–47.

Mangkunegara, A. A. P. (2021). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mathis, R. L., Jackson, J. H., Valentine, S. R., & Meglich, P. (2020). Human Resource Management (16th ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning.

Noe, R. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Gerhart, B., & Wright, P. M. (2021). Fundamentals of Human Resource Management (9th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

Nasution, M. A. (2025). Motivasi kerja dan kinerja pegawai dalam perspektif organisasi birokrasi. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, 10(1), 89–102.

Putra, R. A., & Santoso, B. (2024). Work-life balance sebagai determinan kinerja pegawai sektor publik. Jurnal Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, 18(3), 201–215.

Putri, L. A., Hapsari, R., & Wicaksono, A. (2024). Motivasi kerja dan implikasinya terhadap kinerja pegawai pemerintahan. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Publik, 11(2), 167–180.

Putri, R. K., & Mulyadi, H. (2021). Pengaruh work life balance terhadap kinerja karyawan melalui motivasi kerja. Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis, 18(2), 145–156.

Rahman, A., Yusuf, M., & Hakim, L. (2024). Lingkungan kerja dan kinerja pegawai: Studi pada instansi pemerintah daerah. Jurnal Administrasi Negara, 29(1), 55–69.

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2022). Organizational Behavior (18th ed.). New York: Pearson Education.

Sari, M., & Nugroho, Y. A. (2025). Analisis peran motivasi kerja sebagai variabel mediasi dalam organisasi sektor publik. Jurnal Riset Manajemen, 12(1), 73–88.

Sedarmayanti. (2023). Sumber daya manusia dan produktivitas kerja. Mandar Maju.

Sedarmayanti. (2021). Sumber Daya Manusia dan Produktivitas Kerja. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Siregar, R., & Lubis, H. (2025). Pengaruh lingkungan kerja terhadap kinerja pegawai dengan sistem kerja birokratis. Jurnal Manajemen Publik, 9(1), 41–56.

Sugiarto, Abdi, Yohanes Kamakaula, Lela Susanty, and Periansya. 2024. Metodologi Penelitian. Teori & Praktik. Karawang: Saba Jaya Press.

Sugiyono. (2021). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sutrisno, E. (2020). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Kencana.

Wibowo. (2020). Manajemen Kinerja (6th ed.). Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Wibowo, A., & Ananda, R. (2024). Work-life balance dan motivasi kerja pegawai pemerintah. Jurnal Psikologi Industri dan Organisasi, 13(2), 121–134.

Wirawan. (2020). Evaluasi Kinerja Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Yukl, G. (2020). Leadership in Organizations (9th ed.). New York: Pearson Education.