The Effect of Work and Personal Life Integration on Employee Performance with Work Stress as an Intervening Variable at the Binjai City Manpower, Industry, and Trade Office
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61994/equivalent.v4i2.1944Keywords:
work and personal life integration, work stress, employee performance, public sectorAbstract
The increasing integration of work and personal life in the modern technology-based work environment has presented both opportunities and challenges for employee performance, especially in public sector organizations. While work-life integration offers flexibility, it also has the potential to increase work stress due to the blurring of role boundaries between work and personal life. This study aims to analyze the influence of work-life integration on the performance of employees with work stress as an intervening variable at the Binjai City Manpower, Industry, and Trade Office. This study uses an associative quantitative research design involving 36 civil servants selected through purposive sampling techniques. Data was collected using a structured questionnaire and analyzed using the Structural Equation Modeling–Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS) method using the SmartPLS 3.3.3 application. The results show that work-life integration has a positive and significant effect on employee performance, which indicates that effective integration can improve productivity, focus, and work quality. In addition, work-life integration also has a positive effect on work stress, suggesting that increased role integration can trigger psychological distress when role boundaries are unclear. Work stress has also been shown to have a positive but relatively small effect on employee performance, which indicates the presence of eustress that can encourage motivation and work alertness. Furthermore, work stress has been shown to partially mediate the relationship between work-life integration and employee performance. These findings confirm that while work-life integration is important in improving employee performance, its implementation needs to be accompanied by an effective stress management strategy to maintain the sustainability of employee welfare and achieve optimal organizational performance in public sector institutions.
References
Afandi. (2018). Human Resource Management: Concept Theory and Indicators. Zanafa Publishing.
Allen, T. D., French, K. A., Dumani, S., & Shockley, K. M. (2023). A cross-national meta-analytic examination of work–life integration and employee performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 108(4), 612–630. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001023
Askarov, R. (2024). What Is Work-Life Integration? Monitask Business Glossary.
Brun, A., Lucas, G., & Becerik-Gerber, B. (2025). Under pressure: contextualizing workplace stress towards user-centered interventions. arXiv
Chauhan, P., & Rai, S. (2024). Conceptualizing work-life integration: A review and research agenda. Asia Pacific Management Review, 29(4), 415–426.
Cheung, G. W. (2024). Methods for assessing reliability. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 41(1), 123–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-023-09871-y
Derks, D., van Duin, D., Tims, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2022). Smartphone use and work–life integration: The role of stress and recovery. Human Relations, 75(2), 341–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267211045572
Dwitanti, N., et al. (2025). The Effect of Workload and Job Stress on Employee Performance with Work-Life Balance as an Intervening Variable: Case of BNI. International Journal of Business, Law, and Education, link
Erwansyah, Rintan, Br. S., & Purba, T. O. H. (2022). Digitalization Marketing to Increase Sales for Women MSME Actors in Medan City, North Sumatra. METHABDI Journal of Community Service, 2(2), 137–144. https://doi.org/10.46880/methabdi.Vol2No2.pp137-144
Fauzi, M. A. (2022). Evaluate the structural model using the PLS-SEM approach: R-square, Q-square, and effect size. Scientific Journal of Management, 12(2), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.21009/jim.122.05
Ghozali, I. (2021). Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods, and Applications using the SmartPLS 3.0 Program. Semarang: Publishing Agency of Diponegoro University.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook.Handoko, T. H. (2013). Management (2nd ed.). BPFE.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Hernawaty. (2021). Leadership Style, Motivation and Work Environment Affect Employee Performance. Smart Scientific Journal, 1(1). http://stmb-multismart.ac.id/ejournal
Hidayati, L. N., & Harsono, M. (2022). Literature Review on Stress in Organizations. Journal of Management Science, 18(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.21831/jim.v18i1.39339 UNY Journal
Idrus. (2023). The Impact of Work-Life Integration on Employee Welfare and Work Productivity. COSTING Journal of Economic, Business and Accounting, link
Isa, N., & Indrayati, A. (2023). The mediating role of work-life balance on work-family conflict and employee performance. South African Journal of Human Resource Management, link
Kossek, E. E., Thompson, R. J., & Lautsch, B. A. (2023). Balanced work–life integration: Organizational strategies and employee outcomes. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10, 101–128. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-043509
Le Fevre, M., Matheny, J., & Kolt, G. S. (2023). Eustress, distress, and performance: Revisiting the stress–performance relationship. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 44(3), 356–370. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2674
Medina-Garrido, J. A., et al. (2023). Work-life integration and well-being: Evidence from Spanish banking sector. arXiv preprint, link
Mangkunegara. A.A. P. (2020). Human Resource Management Agency. Edition XIV. PT. Teenager Rosdakarya.
Mushofa, M., Hermina, D., & Huda, N. (2024). Understanding Populations and Samples: A Key Pillar in Quantitative Research. Journal of Syntax Admiration, 5(12), 5937–5948. https://doi.org/10.46799/jsa.v5i12.1992
Ning Wahyuni, & Rindrayani, S. R. (2025). Associative research methodology. Jupiter: Journal of Management, Accounting, and Economics, 14(9), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.8734/musytari.v14i9.10767
Putri, A. N., & Handayani, R. (2024). Work–life integration and employee performance in hybrid work settings. Journal of Management and Organization, 15(1), 45–59.
Riaz, S., Xu, Y., & Hussain, S. (2024). Work–life integration, role blurring, and job stress. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 35(6), 1034–1052. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2023.2251148
Robbin & Judge. (2015). Organizational Behavior 16th Edition. Salemba Four.
Sonnentag, S., & Fritz, C. (2024). Recovery from job stress and its impact on performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 33(1), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214231203456
Susanto, P. C., Arini, D., & et al. (2024). Quantitative research concepts: Population, sample, and Data Analysis (A literature review). Journal of Multidisciplinary Science, 3(1), 9–20
Sugiarto, A., Kamakaula, Y., Susanty, L., & Periansya. (2024). Research Methodology. Theory & Practice. Saba Jaya Press.
Sukmawati, R., & Hermana, C. (2024). The Effect of Work Stress and Work Stress on Employee Performance. Journal of Management and Business Research, 4(1), 51–56.DOI: 10.29313/jrmb.v4i1.4019
Sapphire. (2024, September 4). Development of Integration of work and personal life to Improve the Performance of the Organization in Serving the Public. Research and Development Agency and Training of the Ministry of Religion.
Udin, et al. (2023). Work-life balance, job satisfaction, and affective commitment: Evidence from plywood company employees. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, link
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dermawaty Br. Sihombing, Hernawaty, Erwansyah (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.












