The Influence of Organizational Behavior and Leadership on Employee Performance with Job Satisfaction as an Intervening Variable at the Sidikalang Sub-district Office, Dairi Regency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61994/equivalent.v4i2.1958Keywords:
leadership, organizational behavior, job satisfaction, employee performanceAbstract
This study aims to examine the influence of Leadership and Organizational Behavior on Employee Performance with Job Satisfaction as an intervening variable in the Sidikalang District Office, Dairi Regency. This study uses a quantitative approach with the Structural Equation Modeling method based on Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS). Data was collected through the distribution of questionnaires to employees, then analyzed using SmartPLS software version 3.0. The results of the direct influence analysis showed that Leadership (X2) had a positive and significant effect on Employee Performance (Y) with a path coefficient of 1.060, a T-Statistics value of 19.053 (> 1.96), and P-Values = 0.000. Meanwhile, Organizational Behavior (X1) had no significant effect on Employee Performance, with a path coefficient of 0.134, a T-Statistics value of 1.596 (< 1.96), and P-Values = 0.117. In addition, Leadership also has a positive and significant effect on Job Satisfaction (Z) with a path coefficient of 1.060, a T-Statistics value of 19.053, and P-Values = 0.000, while Organizational Behavior has no significant effect on Job Satisfaction, with a path coefficient of -0.110, a T-Statistics value of 1.585, and P-Values = 0.120. Furthermore, the results of the study show that Job Satisfaction has a positive and significant effect on Employee Performance, with a path coefficient of 1.118, a T-Statistics value of 4.911, and P-Values = 0.000. The results of the indirect influence analysis (mediation) showed that Job Satisfaction was able to significantly mediate the relationship between Leadership and Employee Performance, with a path coefficient of 1.185, a T-Statistics value of 4.340, and P-Values = 0.000. However, Job Satisfaction was not able to mediate the influence of Organizational Behavior on Employee Performance, with a path coefficient of -0.123, a T-Statistics value of 1.341, and P-Values = 0.186. Based on these findings, it is suggested that the Sidikalang District Office focus more attention on improving the quality of leadership and employee job satisfaction as an effort to improve employee performance. Improvements in the aspect of Organizational Behavior alone are not enough to have a significant impact on improving employee performance.
References
Addurorul Muntatsiroh, S. H. (2024). Types of leadership types in an organization. Economic Edu, 4(2), 172–178.
Anwar, D. H. P. (2023). WORK CULTURE, WORK MOTIVATION AND JOB SATISFACTION TO WORK COMMITMENTS. International Journal of Technology, 47(1), 100950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.01.002%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2023.100950%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.04.007%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102816%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.03.015%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j
Aprilia, A. L., Hartono, E., & Wibowo, S. N. (2022). The Effect of Conflict and Work Stress on Employee Job Satisfaction at Pt Pg Rajawali II Psa Palimanan Unit. Scientific Journal of Business Economics, 27(2), 274–288. https://doi.org/10.35760/eb.2022.v27i2.4871
Candana, D. M. (2021). Determination of Work Performance and Job Satisfaction: Work Ethic and Work Discipline (A Review of Human Resource Management Literature). Journal of Applied Management Sciences, 2(4), 544–561. https://doi.org/10.31933/jimt.v2i4.471
Darim, A. (2020). Organizational Behavior Management in Realizing Competent Human Resources. Munaddhomah, 1(1), 22–40. https://doi.org/10.31538/munaddhomah.v1i1.29
Dewi, A. D. (2020). The Effect of Training and Work Motivation on the Performance of Employees of Surya Solar Market Regional Companies. University of Surabaya, July, 1–23. https://repository.um-surabaya.ac.id/3995/3/BAB_II.pdf
Diasmoro, O. (2017). The Relationship of Interpersonal Communication with Early Adult Employee Job Satisfaction in the Production Department of Pt. Gangsar Tulungagung. Scientific Journal of Applied Psychology, 05(01), 2301–8267.
Ferine, K. F., Aditia, R., Rahmadana, M. F., & Indri. (2021). An empirical study of leadership, organizational culture, conflict, and work ethic in determining work performance in Indonesia's education authority. Heliyon, 7(7), e07698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07698
Fitriadi, Y., Susanto, R., Irdam, & Wahyuni, R. (2022). The Contribution of Work Involvement to Employee Performance: The Role of Job Satisfaction Mediation. Journal of Ecobistek, 11, 448–453. https://doi.org/10.35134/ekobistek.v11i4.446
Ghozali. (2018). Application of Multivariate Analysis with IBM SPSS Program 25. Publishing Agency of Diponegoro University.
Ghozali & Latan. (2015). Concepts, Techniques, and Applications Using Smart PLS 3.0 for Empirical Research. BP Undip. SemarangHarnanto. 2017. Cost Accounting: Historical Cost Systems. BPFE.
Ghozali, I. (2016). Multivariete Analysis Applications with IBM SPSS 23 Program (8th Edition). Print VII. Publishing Agency of Diponegoro University.
Hair, J.F., et al. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publications.
Hamsyah, A. I., Hakim, L., & Razak, R. (2020). The Influence of Organizational Structure on the Quality of Public Services. Journal of Public Administration, 1, 1–6. https://journal.unismuh.ac.id/index.php/kimap/index%0Adi
Hanafi (Syah Kuala University), A. S., Almy (Management and Science University), C., & Siregar (APP Polytechnic), M. T. (2018). The Influence of Leadership Style and Work Motivation on Employee Performance. Journal of Industrial and Logistics Management, 2(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.30988/jmil.v2i1.71
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Isran Bintang, Kiki Farida Ferine, Abdi Sugiarto (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.












