Penerapan Pendekatan Heutagogy dalam Meningkatkan Kreativitas Belajar Siswa Kelas X Mata Pelajaran PAI di SMA Negeri 7 Palembang

Muhammad Mirza Naufal; Irja Putra Pratama; Ibnu Rozali

doi:10.61994/taqrib.v4i1.1675

Authors

Muhammad Mirza Naufal Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang
Irja Putra Pratama Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang
Ibnu Rozali Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61994/taqrib.v4i1.1675

Keywords:

Heutagogi, Kreatovotas Belajar, Pendidikan Agama Islam

Abstract

This study examines the application of the Heutagogy approach to enhance students’ learning creativity in Islamic Religious Education (PAI). Using a quantitative pre-experimental one-group pretest-posttest design with 33 tenth-grade students, data were collected through essay tests and projects. The results show a significant improvement in scores from 46.18 to 78.72, with increases in originality, flexibility, and learning autonomy. Statistical analysis indicates p = 0.000 and Cohen’s d = 4.02 (very large effect). The findings suggest that Heutagogy effectively promotes students’ creativity and engagement in learning.

ABSTRAK

Penelitian ini mengkaji penerapan pendekatan heutagogi dalam meningkatkan kreativitas belajar siswa pada Pendidikan Agama Islam (PAI). Menggunakan desain kuantitatif pra-eksperimen one-group pretest-posttest dengan 33 siswa kelas X, data dikumpulkan melalui tes esai dan proyek. Hasil menunjukkan peningkatan signifikan dari 46,18 menjadi 78,72, serta peningkatan pada indikator orisinalitas, fleksibilitas, dan otonomi belajar. Analisis statistik menunjukkan p = 0,000 dan Cohen’s d = 4,02 (efek sangat besar). Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa heutagogi efektif dalam meningkatkan kreativitas dan keterlibatan belajar siswa.

References

Arikunto, Suharsimi. “Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek.” (No Title), 2010.

Beghetto, Ronald A, and James C Kaufman. “Toward a Broader Conception of Creativity: A Case for" Mini-c" Creativity.” Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 1, no. 2 (2007): 73.

Brookhart, Susan M. How to Create and Use Rubrics for Formative Assessment and Grading. Ascd, 2013.

Canning, Natalie. “Playing with Heutagogy: Exploring Strategies to Empower Mature Learners in Higher Education.” Journal of Further and Higher Education, 2010. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770903477102.

Cohen, Louis, Lawrence Manion, and Keith Morrison. Research Methods in Education. routledge, 2002.

Creswell, John W, and J David Creswell. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage publications, 2017.

Etikan, Ilker, Sulaiman Abubakar Musa, and Rukayya Sunusi Alkassim. “Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling.” American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics 5, no. 1 (2016): 1–4.

Fraenkel, Jack Richard, Norman Edward Wallen, and Helen Hyun. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. McGraw-Hill, 2012.

Freeman, Scott, Sarah L Eddy, Miles McDonough, Michelle K Smith, Nnadozie Okoroafor, Hannah Jordt, and Mary Pat Wenderoth. “Active Learning Increases Student Performance in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, no. 23 (2014): 8410–15.

Hase, Stewart, and Chris Kenyon. “Heutagogy: A Child of Complexity Theory.” Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education 4, no. 1 (2007).

Hedges, Larry V. “Effect Sizes for Experimental Research.” British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 2025.

Hidayat, Rian, Hayatun Nufus, and Juaidah Agustina. “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Mind Mapping Terhadap Kemampuan Menulis Teks Karya Ilmiah Siswa Kelas XI SMA Negeri 7 Palembang.” ANTHOR: Education and Learning Journal Volume 1, no. 4 (2022). https://anthor.org/anthor/article/view/36.

Ishaq, Ishaq. “Membangun Kemandirian Belajar Mahasiswa Melalui Pendekatan Heutagogy Dalam Mata Kuliah Teori Belajar Dan Pembelajaran Membangun Kemandirian Belajar Mahasiswa Melalui Pendekatan Heutagogy Dalam Mata Kuliah Teori Belajar Dan Pembelajaran.” Jurnal Riset Dan Inovasi Pembelajaran 4, no. 3 (2024): 2339–50.

Kim, Tae Kyun. “T Test as a Parametric Statistic.” Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 68, no. 6 (2015): 540–46.

McAuliffe, Marisha, Doug Hargreaves, Abbe Winter, and Gary Chadwick. “Does Pedagogy Still Rule?” Australasian Journal of Engineering Education 15, no. 1 (2009): 13–18.

Mertler, Craig A. “Designing Scoring Rubrics for Your Classroom.” Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation 7, no. 1 (2000).

Moore, Robert L. “Developing Lifelong Learning with Heutagogy: Contexts, Critiques, and Challenges.” Distance Education 41, no. 3 (2020): 381–401.

Naufal, Muhammad Mirza. “Observasi Awal Hasil Pengamatan Pembelajaran Pada Siswa Kelas X Di SMA Negeri 7 Palembang.” Palembang, 17 Mei 2025. Pukul 11:00 WIB, n.d.

OECD. “Hasil PISA 2022 (Volume III): Pikiran Kreatif, Sekolah Kreatif.” PISA : OECD PARIS, 2024. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/765ee8c2-en.

Pallant, Julie. SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using IBM SPSS. Routledge, 2020.

Razali, Nornadiah Mohd, and Yap Bee Wah. “Power Comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling Tests.” Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics 2, no. 1 (2011): 21–33.

Reeve, Johnmarshall, and Sung Hyeon Cheon. “Autonomy-Supportive Teaching: Its Malleability, Benefits, and Potential to Improve Educational Practice.” Educational Psychologist 56, no. 1 (2021): 54–77.

Runco, Mark A., and Garrett J. Jaeger. “The Standard Definition of Creativity.” Creativity Research Journal 24, no. 1 (January 2012): 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092.

Scott, Ginamarie, Lyle E Leritz, and Michael D Mumford. “The Effectiveness of Creativity Training: A Quantitative Review.” Creativity Research Journal 16, no. 4 (2004): 361–88.

Shadish, William R, Thomas D Cook, and Donald T Campbell. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Houghton, Mifflin and Company, 2002.

Syarnubi Syarnubi, Muhamad Fauzi, and Baldi Anggara. “Peran Guru Pendidikan Agama Islam Dalam Menanamkan Nilai-Nilai Moderasi Beragama.” In Internasional Education Conference (IEC) FITK, 1(1):112–17, 2023.

Tan, Charlene. Islamic Education and Indoctrination: The Case in Indonesia. Routledge, 2012.

Tashakkori, Abbas, R Burke Johnson, and Charles Teddlie. Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Sage publications, 2020.

Voogt, Joke, and Natalie Pareja Roblin. “A Comparative Analysis of International Frameworks for 21st Century Competences: Implications for National Curriculum Policies.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 44, no. 3 (2012): 299–321.

Widayati, Ani. “Penelitian Tindakan Kelas.” Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia 6, no. 1 (2008).

Zhang, Jianzhen, Yukun Yang, and Jiahao Ge. “Stimulating Creativity in the Classroom: Examining the Impact of Sense of Place on Students’ Creativity and the Mediating Effect of Classmate Relationships.” National Library Of Medicine: National Center For Biotechnology Information, 2023. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01479-7.