Rethinking Emotional Stability: Uncovering the Role of Suppressed Emotions and Social Desirability Bias Among Women Educators

Shalini Das; Shubha Chandra

doi:10.61994/jpss.v4i3.2142

Authors

Shalini Das Garden City University, Bangalore, India
Shubha Chandra Garden City University, Bangalore, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61994/jpss.v4i3.2142

Keywords:

Emotional Suppression, Emotional Stability, Perceived Stress, Social Desirability

Abstract

Emotional stability is considered as a protective personality trait when looked up in psychological literatures that are associated with lowering stress and enhancing well-being (Steel et al., 2008; Kroencke, Geukes, & Denissen, 2020). However, a pilot study of women educators revealed an unexpected positive correlation between emotional stability and perceived stress (Das, 2025). This paradox is confounding and suggests gaps in assumptions that have been made about personality traits and their expression and measurement within a given culture and professional framework. One possibility focuses on emotional suppression and social desirability, which is the phenomenon in which people report higher emotional stability in order to conform to social expectations while undergoing heightened psychological stress (Gross & John, 2003; Paulhus, 2002). This is especially the case for women professionals in collectivist cultures, who are admired for their calmness and self-restraint (Matsumoto, Yoo, & Nakagawa, 2008) a prominent personality aspect of a respectable women under the Indian societal lookout. The study illustrates the need to refine personality–stress models to incorporate gendered, culturally discriminated coping strategies that subvert conventional trait–outcome relationships. These findings, in particular, urge us to exercise methodological caution and propose context-sensitive, mixed-method frameworks in stress and personality research.

References

Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Psychological Assessment Resources.

Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348–362.

Kroencke, L., Geukes, K., & Denissen, J. J. A. (2020). Trait personality and daily stressors. European Journal of Personality, 34(1), 39–59.

Matsumoto, D., Yoo, S. H., & Nakagawa, S. (2008). Culture, emotion regulation, and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(6), 925–937.

Paulhus, D. L. (2002). Socially desirable responding: The evolution of a construct. In H. I. Braun, D. N. Jackson, & D. E. Wiley (Eds.), The role of constructs in psychological and educational measurement (pp. 49–69). Lawrence Erlbaum.

Steel, P., Schmidt, J., & Shultz, J. (2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 134(1), 138–161.

Aldao, A., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Schweizer, S. (2010). Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(2), 217–237.

Bolger, N., & Zuckerman, A. (1995). A framework for studying personality in the stress process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 890–902.

Brody, L. R., & Hall, J. A. (2008). Gender and emotion in context. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones, & L. F. Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of Emotions (3rd ed., pp. 395–408). Guilford.

Butler, E. A., Egloff, B., Wilhelm, F. H., Smith, N. C., Erickson, E. A., & Gross, J. J. (2003). The social consequences of expressive suppression. Emotion, 3(1), 48–67.

Connor-Smith, J. K., & Flachsbart, C. (2007). Relations between personality and coping: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(6), 1080–1107.

Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Psychological Assessment Resources.

Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-Role Interpretation. Erlbaum.

Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271–299.

Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348–362.

Gross, J. J., & Levenson, R. W. (1997). Hiding feelings: The acute effects of inhibiting negative and positive emotion. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106(1), 95–103.

Kotov, R., Gamez, W., Schmidt, F., & Watson, D. (2010). Linking “big” personality traits to anxiety, depressive, and substance use disorders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 768–821.

Kroencke, L., Geukes, K., & Denissen, J. J. A. (2020). Trait personality and daily stressors. European Journal of Personality, 34(1), 39–59.

Lahey, B. B. (2009). Public health significance of neuroticism. American Psychologist, 64(4), 241–256.

Matsumoto, D., Yoo, S. H., & Nakagawa, S. (2008). Culture, emotion regulation, and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(6), 925–937.

Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes (pp. 17–59). Academic Press.

Paulhus, D. L. (2002). Socially desirable responding: The evolution of a construct. In H. I. Braun, D. N. Jackson, & D. E. Wiley (Eds.), The Role of Constructs in Psychological and Educational Measurement (pp. 49–69). Erlbaum.

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.

Richards, J. M., & Gross, J. J. (2000). Emotion regulation and memory: The cognitive costs of keeping one’s cool. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(3), 410–424.

Steel, P., Schmidt, J., & Shultz, J. (2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 134(1), 138–161.

Suls, J., & Martin, R. (2005). The daily life of the garden-variety neurotic: Reactivity, stressor exposure, mood spillover, and maladaptive coping. Journal of Personality, 73(6), 1485–1510.