Transformational Leadership as a Moderator of the Relationship between Openness to Experience and Innovative Work Behavior among Startup Employees in Indonesia

Rina Mulyati; Maya Rizky  Ramadhani

doi:10.61994/jpss.v4i4.2291

Authors

Rina Mulyati Universitas Islam Indonesia
Maya Rizky Ramadhani Universitas Islam Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61994/jpss.v4i4.2291

Keywords:

Innovative Work Behavior, Moderation, Openness to Experience, Transformational Leadership

Abstract

Innovative work behavior is vital for startup competitiveness in dynamic environments. This study examined the effect of openness to experience on innovative work behavior and investigated the moderating role of transformational leadership among Indonesian startup employees. Using a quantitative cross-sectional design, data were collected from 161 purposively sampled employees via the Innovative Work Behaviour Scale, the NEO-FFI (Openness dimension), and the MLQ Form 5X, then analyzed using Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA). The results revealed that openness to experience positively and significantly predicted innovative work behavior. However, transformational leadership significantly moderated this relationship in a negative direction stronger transformational leadership weakened the positive effect of openness to experience. These findings suggest that in startup settings prioritizing flexibility and autonomy, open employees innovate more effectively when granted independent discretion rather than intensive leadership direction. This study extends organizational psychology literature by showing that transformational leadership does not universally enhance innovation; its effectiveness hinges on the alignment between leadership style and employee personality traits.

References

Afsar, B., & Umrani, W. A. (2019). Transformational leadership and innovative work behavior: The role of motivation to learn, task complexity and innovation climate. European Journal of Innovation Management, 23(3), 402–428. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-12-2018-0257

Avolio, B. J., Bass, B. M., & Jung, D. I. (1999). Re‐examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72(4), 441–462. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317999166789

Azwar, S. (2022). Metode penelitian psikologi (II). Pustaka Pelajar.

Bantam, D. J., & Pradana, W. D. (2024). Trust in leaders and organizational commitment study in generation z. SCIENTIA: Social Sciences & Humanities, 3(2), 63–66. https://doi.org/10.51773/sssh.v3i2.282

Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186–3191. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014

Bellibaş, M. Ş., Polatcan, M., & Berkovich, I. (2026). Principal–teacher relationship profiles moderating the effects of transformational leadership on teacher innovation and resistance to change. Educational Administration Quarterly, 62(2), 312–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X251386390

CB Insights. (2026). The top 9 reasons startups fail. CB Insights. https://www.cbinsights.com/research/report/startup-failure-reasons-top/

Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). The five-factor model of personality and its relevance to personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 6(4), 343–359. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.1992.6.4.343

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2022). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

De Hoogh, A. H. B., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2008). Ethical and despotic leadership, relationships with leader’s social responsibility, top management team effectiveness and subordinates’ optimism: A multi-method study. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(3), 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.03.002

De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00547.x

Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Etikariena, A. (2020). Peran gaya kepemimpinan pada perilaku kerja inovatif karyawan pada organisasi berbasis teknologi digital. Jurnal Ecopsy, 7(1), 48–63. https://doi.org/10.20527/ecopsy.v7i1.8426

Field, A. P. (2024). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.513

Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The Development of Markers for the Big-Five Factor Structure. 4, 26–42.

Hammond, M. M., Neff, N. L., Farr, J. L., Schwall, A. R., & Zhao, X. (2011). Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), 90–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018556

Jameel, A., Guo, W., Hussain, A., & Kanwel, S. (2025). Enhancing innovative work behavior through transformational leadership in tourism and hospitality employees: The mediating role of intrinsic motivation and employee creativity. BMC Psychology, 13(1018), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03305-8

Kane, G. C., Palmer, D., Phillips, A. N., Kiron, D., & Buckley, N. (2015). Strategy, not technology, drives digital transformation. MIT Sloan Management Review and Deloitte University Press.

Karimi, S., Ahmadi Malek, F., Yaghoubi Farani, A., & Liobikienė, G. (2023). The role of transformational leadership in developing innovative work behaviors: The mediating role of employees’ psychological capital. Sustainability, 15(2), 1267. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021267

Kominfo RI. (2019). Laporan kinerja Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika 2019. Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia. https://www.komdigi.go.id/kinerja/laporan-tahunan/detail?judul=laporan-tahunan-kementerian-kominfo-tahun-2019

Kristof‐Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta‐analysis of person–job, person–organization, person–group, and person–supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x

Kurniyanta, A., Nuzula, N. F., Fahrudi, A. N. L. I., & Astuti, E. S. (2026). Developing a model of innovation capability and digital transformation in Indonesia’s public sector: The role of leadership and IT governance. Cogent Business & Management, 13(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2026.2637243

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 81–90.

Nurcahyo, R., Ilhamsyah Akbar, M., & Sihono Gabriel, D. (2018). Characteristics of startup company and its strategy: Analysis of Indonesia fashion startup companies. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(2.34), 44–47. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.34.13908

Rua, O. L., & Carvalho, A. R. (2023). Linking transformational leadership to start-ups creativity. Revista de Gestão e Secretariado (Management and Administrative Professional Review), 14(7), 11650–11673. https://doi.org/10.7769/gesec.v14i7.2498

Salamzadeh, A., & Kesim, H. K. (2015). Startup companies: Life cycle and challenges. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Employment, Education and Entrepreneurship (EEE). 4th International Conference on Employment, Education and Entrepreneurship (EEE). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2628861

Saranani, F., Adam, P., Ahmad, Armawaddin, M., Hasnita, N., & Almana, L. O. (2026). The effect of social identification, personality traits, and transformational leadership on employees performance at the regional parliament secretariat of Southeast Sulawesi province, Indonesia. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 8(7), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2026466

Setyowati, D. (2023). Daftar startup tutup selama 2023, melonjak dibanding 2022. Katadata. https://katadata.co.id/digital/startup/658e563eda94d/daftar-startup-tutup-selama-2023-melonjak-dibanding-2022

Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 933–958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.007

West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1989). Innovation at work: Psychological perspectives. Social Behaviour, 4(1), 15-30.

Woods, S. A., Mustafa, M. J., Anderson, N., & Sayer, B. (2017). Innovative work behavior and personality traits: Examining the moderating effects of organizational tenure. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 33(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-01-2017-0016

Zhou, J. (2003). When the presence of creative coworkers is related to creativity: Role of supervisor close monitoring, developmental feedback, and creative personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 413–422. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.413