Disparitas Hakim Dalam Menentukan Cacat Formil Error In Persona Pada Perkara Ekonomi Syariah: Studi Komparatif Putusan Pengadilan

Fatia Hanifa; Qodariah Barkah

doi:10.61994/jsls.v4i1.1677

Authors

Fatia Hanifa Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
Qodariah Barkah Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61994/jsls.v4i1.1677

Keywords:

disparity, error in persona exception, judges consideration

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the legal basis of judges’ considerations in identifying formal defects of error in persona in Islamic economic disputes, as reflected in Decision Number 393/Pdt.G/2023/MS.Bna and Decision Number 2275/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Plg, as well as to analyze the factors contributing to judicial disparities in determining such defects based on these two decisions. This research employs a normative/dogmatic legal method using the statute approach, conceptual approach, and case approach, aimed at examining statutory regulations, Civil Procedure Law, and relevant legal literature. The findings indicate that in examining and determining the formal defect of error in persona, particularly in the form of a misdirected or improperly addressed claim in an Islamic economic case, the panel of judges in Decision Number 393/Pdt.G/2023/MS.Bna upheld the defendant’s error in persona exception, resulting in the plaintiff’s claim being declared inadmissible. Furthermore, the factors contributing to judicial disparities in determining the error in persona exception, based on the two decisions, include the substance of the defendant’s exception and whether it is substantiated and legally grounded, the judges’ interpretative discretion, and differences in the legal bases applied by the judges

References

Harahap, M. Y. (2014). Hukum acara perdata tentang gugatan, persidangan, penyitaan, pembuktian, dan putusan pengadilan (Cet. ke-14). Sinar Grafika.

Lemek, J. (1993). Penuntun membuat gugatan. Liberty.

Manan, A. (2008). Penerapan hukum acara perdata di lingkungan peradilan agama. Kencana.

Mertokusumo, S. (2002). Mengenal hukum. Liberty.

Muryati, S. (2003). Tinjauan hukum tentang eksepsi serta akibat hukumnya dalam sengketa perdata: Studi kasus di Pengadilan Negeri Semarang (Skripsi, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung).

Panjaitan, H. (2014). Kumpulan kaidah hukum putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia tahun 1953–2008 berdasarkan penggolongannya. Prenadamedia Group.

Sanjaya, U. H. (2015). Keadilan hukum pada pertimbangan hakim dalam memutus hak asuh anak. Yuridika, 30(2), 352–367.

Sarwano. (2011). Hukum acara perdata. Sinar Grafika.

Suherman, A. (2019). Implementasi independensi hakim dalam pelaksanaan kekuasaan kehakiman. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 1(1), 42–51.

Tim Redaksi Nuansa. (2004). Undang-Undang No. 4 Tahun 2004 tentang kekuasaan kehakiman. UII Press.

Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1995 tentang Perseroan Terbatas.

Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2006 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 tentang Peradilan Agama.

Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan.

Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.