Harmonisasi Nalar Bayani, Irfani, dan Burhani: Menuju Formulasi Fikih yang Komprehensif
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aims to formulate a harmonization model between Bayani, Irfani, and Burhani reasonings in an effort to create a more comprehensive and adaptive formulation of Fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence). Historically, Fiqh studies have been predominantly dominated by Bayani reasoning, which is textualist-legalistic in nature, often resulting in rigid legal products that lack spiritual depth and social relevance. Utilizing a qualitative research method with a philosophical-epistemological approach, this study focuses on addressing two primary issues: the impact of the partial application of these epistemologies on the validity of Fiqh products, and the ideal integration model of Bayani, Irfani, and Burhani in responding to contemporary legal challenges. The results indicate that the harmonization of these three reasonings is an absolute necessity for the development of modern Fiqh. Bayani reasoning serves to safeguard the authority of the text (revelation); Irfani provides ethical-sufistic depth to ensure the law retains its spiritual essence; and Burhani offers rational validation and scientific analysis of social realities. This review reveals that an imbalance or the exclusive use of only one reasoning leads to flawed legal products—becoming either overly rigid due to literalism, too subjective due to intuition, or excessively secular due to pure rationalism. The study concludes that a comprehensive Fiqh formulation can only be achieved through an integrated epistemological framework. By synthesizing text, intuition, and context, Fiqh will be capable of addressing contemporary challenges without losing its transcendental identity.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Abdulah Pakarti, M. H., Farid, D., Banaesa, I., Nurdin, R., Abdurrohman, Y., & Basuni, I. (2023). Perkembangan Ushul Fiqh Di Dunia Kontemporer. Al-Syakhsiyyah: Journal of Law & Family Studies, 5(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.21154/syakhsiyyah.v5i1.7065
Abdullah, M. A. (2006). Islamic Studies di Perguruan Tinggi: Pendekatan Integratif-Interkonektif. Pustaka Pelajar.
Abdullah, M. A. (2020). Multidisiplin, Interdisiplin, dan Transdisiplin Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Riset pada Pendidikan Tinggi Masa Depan. Prosiding Konferensi Integrasi Interkoneksi Islam Dan Sains, 2.
Al-Farabi. (1986). Kitāb al-Burhān. Dār al-Mashriq.
Al-Ghazali, A. H. M. bin M. (1993). Mustashfa Min Ilmi al-Ushul. Daral-Kutub al-ilmiyyah.
Al-Jabiri, M. A. (1986). Bunyah al-‘Aql al-‘Arabi. Markaz Dirasat al-Wahdah al-‘Arabiyah.
Al-Jābirī, M. A. (1986). Takwīn al-ʿAql al-ʿArabī. Markaz Dirāsāt al-Waḥdah al-ʿArabiyyah.
Al-Qushayri, A. K. (2002). al-Risālah al-Qushayriyyah. Dār al-Khayr.
Al-Sarraj, A. N. (1960). al-Luma‘ fī al-Taṣawwuf. Dār al-Kutub al-Ḥadīthah.
Am, A. B., Zulfikar, E., Gofur, A., & Baedowi, A. (2025). "Rethinking Vasectomy Policy : MUI ’ s Fatwas , Ethics , and Economic Coercion in West Java a Maqāṣid Syarī’ah Analysis". El-Mashlahah 15(2). https://doi.org/10.23971/el-mashlahah.v15i2.10162
Arabi, I. (n.d.). al-Futūḥāt al-Makkiyyah. In 1 (p. 72). Dār Ṣādir.
Asy-Syafi`i, M. bin I. (1938). ar-Risalah. Mustafa al-Bab al-Halabi.
Asy-Syāthibi, A. I. (1997). Al-Muwāfaqāt. In Juz 2. Dār Ibn ‘Affān.
Azrial Syahrur Ramadhan. (2025). The Relations Between Epistimology System of Bayani, Burhani, and Irfani. ABHATS: Jurnal Islam Ulil Albab, 6(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.20885/abhats.vol6.iss1.art1
Bahauddin, A. (2025). Relevansi Epistemologi Abid al-Jabiri Bagi Pembangunan Negara Hukum Demokratis-Religius. Jurnal Hukum Ketatanegaraan, 3(1).
Fadel, M. (2024). Islamic Law, Collective Obligations and Pursuing a Just Global Order. Islamic Studies Review, 3(2), 172–195. https://doi.org/10.56529/isr.v3i2.323
Hallaq, W. B. (2009). An Introduction to Islamic Law. Cambridge University Press.
Hendriza, B. M. R. E. (2024). Epistemologi Nalar Bayani, Burhani, dan Irfani Dalam Filsafat Pendidikan Islam. Islamic Management: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 7.
Jasser Auda. (2007). Maqasid al-Shariah as Philosophy of Islamic Law: A Systems Approach. e-book ed. The International Institute of Islamic Thought London.
Kadriah, A., & Sumarna, D. (2023). DEKOSNTRUKSI EPISTEMOLOGI TIMUR DALAM ILMU PENGETAHUAN HUKUM. Journal Justiciabelen (JJ), 3(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.35194/jj.v3i1.2874
Kausar, S. (2024). Analysis of the Islamic Law and its Compatibility with Artificial Intelligence as a Emerging Challenge of the Modern World. Annals of Human and Social Sciences, 5(I). https://doi.org/10.35484/ahss.2024(5-I)10
Khairina, A. I. (2016). Kritik Epistimologi Nalar Arab Muhammad Abed Al-Jabiri. El-Wasathiya: Jurnal Studi Agama, 4(1).
Manzhur, A. F. J. M. bin M. I. (1997). Lisan al-Arab. In 2 (p. 251). Dar as-Shodir.
Mudawam, S. (2021). The Uṣūl al-Fiqh Approach on the Understanding of Islamic Law in Contemporary Era: Source and Contextualization. Asy-Syir’ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Hukum, 55(2), 315. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajish.v55i2.1004
Muhammad Syarif. (2022). Pendekatan Bayani, Burhani dan Irfani dalam Pengembangan Hukum Islam. Jurnal Al-Mizan, 9(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.54621/jiam.v9i2.430
Nurhadi, N. (2023). Implementation Of Bayani, Burhani, And Irfani Concepts In Fiqh Learning At The Muhammadiyah University Of Jakarta (Epistemological Approach). Proceeding of The Postgraduate School Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta, 1, 361–380. https://doi.org/10.24853/pi.1.0.2023.361-380
Rahman, F. (1982a). Islam and Modernity: Transformation of an Intellectual Tradition. University of Chicago Press.
Rahman, F. (1982b). Islam and Modernity: Transformation of an Intellectual Tradition. University of Chicago Press.
Suryantoro, D. D. (2025). Transformation of Islamic Law in Responding to the Challenges of Modernity by Integrating Classical Fiqh and Contemporary Fiqh. Al-Rasῑkh: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 14(2), 194–207. https://doi.org/10.38073/rasikh.2747
Sutarto, D. (2017). Epistemologi Keilmuan Integratif-Interkonektif M. Amin Abdullah dan Resolusi Konflik. JURNAL TRIAS POLITIKA, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.33373/jtp.v1i2.1064
Sya’adah, F. (2025). Epistemologi Integratif Bayani-Burhani-Irfani: Kerangka Holistik Kontemporer. Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 10(4), 366–378. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i04.38060
Syaifuddin. (2011). Epistemologi Fiqh: Bagaimana Fiqh diproduk. Jurnal Falasifa, 2(2), 37–50. https://jurnalfalasifa.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/3-syaifuddin-epistimologi-fiqh-bagaimana-fiqh-diproduk.pdf
Widodo, S. A. (2007). Nala Bayani, ’Irfani, Dan Burhanidan Implikasinyaterhadap Keilmuan Pesantren. Jurnal Kajian Islam Interdisipliner, 6(1), 66–92.
Yonathan Parlinggoman Wicaksono, & Mahipal Mahipal. (2025). Eksistensi Hukum Islam Dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional Indonesia: Peluang Dan Tantangan. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory, 3(3), 2138–2151. https://doi.org/10.62976/ijijel.v3i3.1238