The Role of Technological Knowledge in Student Engagement, Mediated by Self-Efficacy among Students at High School X

Dina Maria; Vira Arini Ridwan; Febrianis Virlita; Rilla Sovitriana

doi:10.61994/jipbs.v4i2.1649

Authors

Dina Maria Universitas Persada Indonesia Y.A.I Jakarta
Vira Arini Ridwan Universitas Persada Indonesia Y.A.I Jakarta
Febrianis Virlita Universitas Persada Indonesia Y.A.I Jakarta
Rilla Sovitriana Universitas Persada Indonesia Y.A.I Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61994/jipbs.v4i2.1649

Keywords:

Technological knowledge, Student engagement, Self-efficacy, Students, Distance Learning

Abstract

This study aims to examine and analyze the role of technological knowledge on student engagement mediated by self-efficacy among students of Senior High School X. Technological knowledge refers to an individual’s proficiency in understanding and utilizing various information technologies to accomplish tasks. Student engagement is described as the level of student’s participation in learning and teaching activities that lead to student’s learning outcomes and goals. Self-efficacy is defined as an individual’s belief in their ability to achieve desired goals. A total of 270 students participated in this study. The sampling technique used was non-probability sampling with a random sampling method. Multiple regression analysis was conducted to examine the relationships among variables. The results indicated that self-efficacy partially mediates the role of technological knowledge on student engagement. Based on the comparative analysis, younger students were found to have higher average levels of technological knowledge and student engagement compared to older students. Additionally, tenth-grade students demonstrated higher average levels of technological knowledge, self-efficacy, and two dimensions of student engagement. Furthermore, students who chose online learning showed higher average levels of technological knowledge and self-efficacy, while students who chose hybrid learning demonstrated higher emotional engagement.

References

Abubakari, M. S., & Mashoedah. (2021). Online learning engagement model for international students in Indonesia amid covid-19 period: A conceptual model proposal. International Journal of Distance Education and E-Learning (IJDEEL), 6(2), 15-30.

Akturk, A. O., & Ozturk, S. H. (2019). Teachers' TPACK levels and students' self-efficacy as predictors of students' academic achievement. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 5(1), 283-294.

Ali, M. M., & Hassan, N. (2018). Defining concepts of student engagement and factors contributing to their engagement in schools. Creative Education, 9(14), 2161-2170.

Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71-81). Academic Press.

Basar, A. M. (2021). Problematika pembelajaran jarak jauh pada masa pandemi covid-19. Edunesia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 2(1), 208-218.

Bestari, N. P. (2020). 2020: Pertama dalam sejarah, sekolah tutup beralih ke online. CNBC Indonesia.

Cahyani, A., Listiana, I. D., & Larasati, S. P. D. (2020). Motivasi belajar siswa SMA pada pembelajaran daring di masa pandemi covid-19. IQ (Ilmu Al-qur’an): Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 3(1), 123-140.

Chen, Y. (2014). A study on student self-efficacy and technology acceptance model within an online task-based learning environment. Journal of Computers, 9(1), 34-43.

Dixson, M. D. (2015). Measuring student engagement in the online course: The online student engagement scale (OSE). Online Learning, 19(4).

Fernandez, M. G. N. (2020). Sekolah masih online, Ombudsman minta menteri Nadiem penuhi ini. Bisnis.com.

Firdausih, A., & Patria, B. (2018). Efikasi diri bahasa inggris sebagai mediator antara orientasi tujuan penguasaan dan keterikatan siswa belajar bahasa inggris. Gadjah Mada Journal of Psychology, 4(1), 78-86.

Gunuc, S., & Kuzu, A. (2014). Student engagement scale: Development, reliability and validity. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(4), 587-610.

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.

Kuh, G. D. (2009). What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 50(6), 683-706.

Lindsey, H. L. (2017). Self-efficacy, student engagement, and student learning in introductory statistics. ScholarWorks.

Novrianto, R., Marettih, A. K. E., & Wahyudi, H. (2019). Validitas konstruk instrumen general self efficacy scale versi Indonesia. Jurnal Psikologi, 15(1), 1-9.

Nurrindar, M., & Wahjudi, E. (2021). Pengaruh self-efficacy terhadap keterlibatan siswa melalui motivasi belajar. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi (JPAK), 9(1), 140-148.

Olivier, E., Archambault, I., De Clercq, M., & Galand, B. (2019). Student self-efficacy, classroom engagement, and academic achievement: Comparing three theoretical frameworks. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(2), 326–340.

Schindler, L. A., Burkholder, G. J., Morad, O. A., & Marsh, C. (2017). Computer-based technology and student